4.7 Article

An alternative formation mechanism of {332}BCC twinning in metastable body-centered-cubic high entropy alloy

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114770

关键词

Twinning; High entropy alloy; Martensitic phase transformation; HRTEM

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFB3702400]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [KQTD20170328154443162, ZDSYS201703031748354]
  3. GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515110348]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P006566/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/R00661X/1]
  6. Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study uncovers a special twinning transformation mechanism in the formation of {332}(BCC) twinning in high entropy alloys, providing insights into the process of twinning generation in this specific alloy system.
In this work, the origin of {332}(BCC )twinning was investigated in a body-centered-cubic (BCC) high entropy alloy (TiZrHf)87Ta13 (at.%). Detailed transmission electron microscopy analysis of the deformed microstructure revealed that a special {351} < 211 >(alpha) type II twinning generates in the early deformation stage, and with further straining, the {351} < 211 >(alpha) type II twin variant accommodates into a {351}(alpha) type I twin variant. The resultant {351}(alpha) type I twinning exhibits good lattice correspondence with the {332}BCC twinning and further propagates into the retained BCC grain with orientation relationship of {351}(alpha) //(332)(BCC), structuring into a {332}(BCC) twin-like configuration. Based on the experimental results and twinning analysis through evaluating twinning shear and atomic shuffle mechanism of this specific feature, our findings provide an alternative mechanism for the formation of {332}(BCC) twinning in which a special martensitic type II to type I twinning transformation mechanism took effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据