4.7 Article

Pre-harvest silicon spraying: Impact on decay, metabolism, and overall quality of 'Galaxy' apples after harvest and cold storage

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111122

关键词

Malus domestica; Ethylene; Russeting; Respiration

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [28/2018 Universal/Faixa A, 423030/2018-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that foliar silicon treatment does not reduce decay incidence in 'Galaxy' apples after cold storage, and in some cases, it may even increase decay incidence. The treatment also does not increase physiological disorders in the fruit, but it may enhance ripening metabolism in certain periods.
New strategies to reduce apple decay and maintain fruit quality during postharvest with low environmental impact are crucial. Thus, we aimed to assess the effects of pre-harvest foliar silicon (Si) application on decay incidence, metabolism, and overall fruit quality of 'Galaxy' apples at harvest and after cold storage. The experiments were performed during four seasons in commercial orchards and stored in cold rooms, and the following treatments were evaluated: 0, 1.12, 2.24, and 3.36 g L(-1 )of foliar sodium silicate (SS) (2015-16 and 2017-18 seasons), 0, 1.68, and 3.36 g L-1 of foliar SS (2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons), and 0, 1.68, and 3.36 g L-1 of sodium metasilicate (2019-20 season). Upon being harvested, the fruit were kept in cold storage. Foliar Si treatment of 'Galaxy' apples did not reduce decay incidence and severity after cold storage, and in some cases, it increased decay incidence. Moreover, Si treatment did not increase physiological disorders such as russeting, bitter pit, flesh breakdown, and mealiness. In some periods, Si treatment enhanced ripening metabolism as supported by higher ethylene biosynthesis, ACC oxidase activity, and reduced flesh firmness. Therefore, foliar Si application does not provide benefits to 'Galaxy' apple decay control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据