Comparative water footprint assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles and compressed natural gas vehicles

Utilization of renewable energy has become a current energy development trend. In this study, the water footprints of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and a compressed natural gas vehicle (CNG) under different fuel scenarios were evaluated. The FCEV exhibits a low water footprint of 27.2 L/100 km under steam methane reforming hydrogen production technology. Hydrogen production using steam methane reforming and water electrolysis via wind can enable the FCEV industry to save more water resources. The percentage difference between different metallic materials in automobiles was analyzed. The water consumption by steel accounted for 73.6% and 80.5%,respectively. The fluctuation law of the water footprint was analyzed based on different power structures and steel water consumption coefficients. It was found that for low steel water consumption coefficient, wind power generation is conducive to slowing down the water consumption during the entire life cycle. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for the FCEV and CNG under different fuel scenarios. Fuel technology and material structure have a significant impact on the total water footprint. The results of this study can provide guidance for the layout of the automobile industry and for water-saving measures in the future.

Automated summary

This study evaluates the water footprints of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) and compressed natural gas vehicles (CNGs) under different fuel scenarios and analyzes the water consumption by different metallic materials. The results show that changing fuel technology and material structure significantly affect the total water footprint. Additionally, the study provides guidance for the layout of the automobile industry and water-saving measures in the future.