4.2 Article

ANALYSIS OF THE MISTAKES IN XUANFENGJIAO AND TENGKONG WAIBAITUI JUMPS IN WUSHU. A PILOT STUDY

出版社

RED IRIS
DOI: 10.15366/rimcafd2022.86.014

关键词

wushu; jump; error; Observational methodology; T-pattern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this research is to identify and analyze common mistakes in jumps in wushu competition, and provide suggestions for improvement. The most frequent mistakes found are insufficient rotation degree and lack of height during kicks. These mistakes impact various aspects of the jump, including attack, aerial development, landing, and stability. By studying these issues, wushu instructors and referees can provide more accurate feedback during training and competition, thus enhancing the athletes' technique.
The objective of this research is to identify and analyze T-Patterns and polar coordinates and the technical and behavioral sequential mistakes that occur in two jumps with a rotation of 540 degrees integrated in the forms and routines of wushu competition (taolu). We analyzed 47 forms of an international senior men's competition: 43 Xuanfengjiao jumps and 33 Tengkong-Waibaitui jumps. We use observational methodology. The analysis has been performed by employing traditional statistic tests, T-Pattern detection and polar coordinate analysis. The most frequent mistakes are the insufficient degree of rotation and the lack of height of the kick at shoulder level. The mistake sequences affect the attack of the jump (taking more than four steps), aerial development (with lack of height of the kick at the level of the shoulders and with the non-extension of the leg), landing on the floor (with the insufficient degree of rotation and without both feet) and the reception and imbalances (with no direct entry into position and with the movement of the feet or compensatory rebound to avoid losing balance). Wushu instructors, referees and coaches can use these results to improve the training and development of the competition and to improve the trainer's techniques by providing more accurate feedbacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据