4.4 Review

A review on the application of machine learning for combustion in power generation applications

期刊

REVIEWS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 1027-1059

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/revce-2021-0107

关键词

carbon capture technology; coal fired plants; combustion process; machine learning algorithms; optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a review of the applications of machine learning techniques in different combustion processes and discusses the potential benefits and challenges of using machine learning to improve the sustainability of combustion systems.
Although the world is shifting toward using more renewable energy resources, combustion systems will still play an important role in the immediate future of global energy. To follow a sustainable path to the future and reduce global warming impacts, it is important to improve the efficiency and performance of combustion processes and minimize their emissions. Machine learning techniques are a cost-effective solution for improving the sustainability of combustion systems through modeling, prediction, forecasting, optimization, fault detection, and control of processes. The objective of this study is to provide a review and discussion regarding the current state of research on the applications of machine learning techniques in different combustion processes related to power generation. Depending on the type of combustion process, the applications of machine learning techniques are categorized into three main groups: (1) coal and natural gas power plants, (2) biomass combustion, and (3) carbon capture systems. This study discusses the potential benefits and challenges of machine learning in the combustion area and provides some research directions for future studies. Overall, the conducted review demonstrates that machine learning techniques can play a substantial role to shift combustion systems towards lower emission processes with improved operational flexibility and reduced operating cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据