4.7 Article

Investigating the flow dynamics and turbulence at a tidal-stream energy site in a highly energetic estuary

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 252-262

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.020

关键词

Estuary; Tidal energy; Turbulence; ADCP

资金

  1. European Union [815180]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [815180] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements from the Nortek Signature acoustic Doppler current profiler were used to evaluate the kinetic power density, turbulence characteristics, and energy spectra at a tidal energy site. The results showed significant differences in kinetic power density between flood tide and ebb tide, with a strong influence of bathymetry features and headlands on turbulence intensity.
Measurements of an upward-looking Nortek Signature 1000 kHz five-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler are used to evaluate the mid-depth kinetic power density of the flow, energy-spectra of the velocity, turbulence intensity and an approximate turbulent kinetic energy budget at an estuarine tidal stream energy site. The kinetic power density is 7 times higher during ebb tide than flood tide. Results reveal a strong influence of the bathymetry features and headland in the level of turbulence. A production-dissipation balance is demonstrated during the flooding stages of the tide whereas the ebbing stages of the tide exhibits a strongly unbalanced dissipation and production. Five (out of six) Reynolds stresses are calculated by the Dewey and Stringer's formulations which combine variances of the along-beam velocities, corrected from Doppler noise. The fifth beam of the Nortek Signature enables the direct (reference) measurement of the variances associated with the vertical flow direction thus offering the opportunity to test the validity of the Reynolds stresses derived from the Dewey and Stringer's formulations. The gap between the reference and the reconstructed variance associated with the vertical flow direction is found to be less than 5%.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据