4.6 Article

The effect of some modifier oxides on the radiation shielding properties of zirconia doped sodium borosilicate glasses

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110164

关键词

Modifier oxides; Radiation shielding; Zirconia doped sodium borosilicate glass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of Li2O, MgO, ZnO, and CaO on the radiation shielding properties of BSNZ-MO glasses were studied. BSNZ-Zn demonstrated the highest shielding performance, while BSNZ-Li showed the lowest. BSNZ-Zn had the smallest HVL and TVL among all the glasses. The Z(eff) and Neff values of BSNZ-MO glasses varied with different modifier oxides. BSNZ-Zn exhibited the best TMSP for protons, alpha particles, and heavy carbon ions, while BSNZ-Li had the worst. The R values for electrons were highest for BSNZ-Mg and lowest for BSNZ-Zn. Moreover, BSNZ-Li had the highest FNRC, while BSNZ-Mg had the lowest among the BSNZ-MO glasses.
The effect of some modifier oxides (MO) which are Li2O, MgO, ZnO and CaO on the radiation shielding features of B2O3-SiO2-Na2O-ZrO2-MO (BSNZ-MO) glasses were studied by using Geant4 Monte Carlo and the results were theoretically compared by using Phy-X/PSD software between 0.1 MeV and 10 MeV energies. BSNZ-Zn has the highest mu and mu/rho values whereas BSNS-Li has the lowest mu and mu/rho values. The HVLs and TVLs of BSNZ-Zn are the smallest among the BSNZ-MO glasses. The Z(eff) values of BSNZ-MO glasses change in order of BSNZ-Li < BSNZ-Mg < BSNZ-Ca < BSNZ-Zn. The Neff values of BSNZ-MO glasses vary like Zeff values except for 0.4 MeV-3 MeV photon energies. The TMSPs are the lowest for BSNZ-Zn and they are the greatest for BSNZ-Li for protons, alpha particles and heavy carbon ion. The R values of electron are the maximum for BSNZ-Mg and they are minimum for the BSNz-Zn. Besides, The FNRC of the BSNZ-Li has the greatest whereas the FNRC of the BSNZ-Mg has the lowest among the BSNZ-MO glasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据