4.7 Article

The influence of demographic and meteorological factors on temporal patterns of rotavirus infection in Dhaka, Bangladesh

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2727

关键词

rotavirus seasonality; rotavirus transmission; meteorological factors; birth rate; demography

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01AI112970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the seasonal pattern of rotavirus in Bangladesh shifted from biannual peaks to annual peaks in winter due to a declining birth rate. Meteorological factors also have an impact on the transmission rate of rotavirus before vaccination.
To quantify the potential impact of rotavirus vaccines and identify strategies to improve vaccine performance in Bangladesh, a better understanding of the drivers of pre-vaccination rotavirus patterns is required. We developed and fitted mathematical models to 23 years (1990-2012) of weekly rotavirus surveillance data from Dhaka with and without incorporating long-term and seasonal variation in the birth rate and meteorological factors. We performed external model validation using data between 2013 and 2019 from the regions of Dhaka and Matlab. The models showed good agreement with the observed age distribution of rotavirus cases and captured the observed shift in seasonal patterns of rotavirus hospitalizations from biannual to annual peaks. The declining long-term trend in the birth rate in Bangladesh was the key driver of the observed shift from biannual to annual winter rotavirus patterns. Meteorological indices were also important: a 1 degrees C, 1% and 1 mm increase in diurnal temperature range, surface water presence and degree of wetness were associated with a 19%, 3.9% and 0.6% increase in the transmission rate, respectively. The model demonstrated reasonable predictions for both Dhaka and Matlab, and can be used to evaluate the impact of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh against changing patterns of disease incidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据