4.8 Article

Genetic and structural basis of the human anti-α-galactosyl antibody response

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2123212119

关键词

alpha-galactose; antibody; germline restriction; mammalian meat allergy

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1113904]
  2. NHMRC [1142186, 1108800, 1157744, 1081858]
  3. New South Wales Health Early-to Mid-Career Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans produce anti-alpha-gal antibodies in response to various immunogens, and this study reveals a common binding motif in these antibodies which is associated with a specific genetic factor. Additionally, the introduction of this binding motif into certain antibody libraries allows for the rapid selection of alpha-gal binders.
Humans lack the capacity to produce the Gal alpha 1-3Gal beta 1-4GlcNAc (alpha-gal) glycan, and produce anti-alpha-gal antibodies upon exposure to the carbohydrate on a diverse set of immunogens, including commensal gut bacteria, malaria parasites, cetuximab, and tick proteins. Here we use X-ray crystallographic analysis of antibodies from alpha-gal knockout mice and humans in complex with the glycan to reveal a common binding motif, centered on a germline-encoded tryptophan residue at Kabat position 33 (W33) of the complementarity-determining region of the variable heavy chain (CDRH1). Immunoglobulin sequencing of anti-alpha-gal B cells in healthy humans and tick-induced mammalian meat anaphylaxis patients revealed preferential use of heavy chain germline IGHV3-7, encoding W33, among an otherwise highly polyclonal antibody response. Antigen binding was critically dependent on the presence of the germline-encoded W33 residue for all of the analyzed antibodies; moreover, introduction of the W33 motif into naive IGHV3-23 antibody phage libraries enabled the rapid selection of alpha-gal binders. Our results outline structural and genetic factors that shape the human anti-alpha-galactosyl antibody response, and provide a framework for future therapeutics development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据