4.8 Article

Molecular framework integrating nitrate sensing in root and auxin-guided shoot adaptive responses

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122460119

关键词

nitrate; plant development; macronutrient

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [FWF01_I1774S]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [19-00973S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant mineral nutrition, especially nitrate uptake, plays a crucial role in plant growth and development. Roots act as a key regulator in coordinating the growth and development of plant organs in response to nitrate availability, through a complex regulatory mechanism involving cytokinin response factors and auxin transporters.
Mineral nutrition is one of the key environmental factors determining plant development and growth. Nitrate is the major form of macronutrient nitrogen that plants take up from the soil. Fluctuating availability or deficiency of this element severely limits plant growth and negatively affects crop production in the agricultural system. To cope with the heterogeneity of nitrate distribution in soil, plants evolved a complex regulatory mechanism that allows rapid adjustment of physiological and developmental processes to the status of this nutrient. The root, as a major exploitation organ that controls the uptake of nitrate to the plant body, acts as a regulatory hub that, according to nitrate availability, coordinates the growth and development of other plant organs. Here, we identified a regulatory framework, where cytokinin response factors (CRFs) play a central role as a molecular readout of the nitrate status in roots to guide shoot adaptive developmental response. We show that nitrate-driven activation of NLP7, a master regulator of nitrate response in plants, fine tunes biosynthesis of cytokinin in roots and its translocation to shoots where it enhances expression of CRFs. CRFs, through direct transcriptional regulation of PIN auxin transporters, promote the flow of auxin and thereby stimulate the development of shoot organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据