4.8 Article

Interferon resistance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2203760119

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; interferons; innate immunity; variants of concern

资金

  1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado
  2. Tietze Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI134220]
  4. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [00169G220]
  5. Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced resistance to interferons suggests that evasion of innate immunity may be a driving force in the evolution of the virus.
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced transmissibility, pathogenesis, and resistance to vaccines presents urgent challenges for curbing the COVID-19 pandemic. While Spike mutations that enhance virus infectivity or neutralizing antibody evasion may drive the emergence of these novel variants, studies documenting a critical role for interferon responses in the early control of SARS-CoV-2 infection, combined with the presence of viral genes that limit these responses, suggest that interferons may also influence SARS-CoV-2 evolution. Here, we compared the potency of 17 different human interferons against multiple viral lineages sampled during the course of the global outbreak, including ancestral and five major variants of concern that include the B.1.1.7 (alpha), B.1.351 (beta), P.1 (gamma), B.1.617.2 (delta), and B.1.1.529 (omicron) lineages. Our data reveal that relative to ancestral isolates, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern exhibited increased interferon resistance, suggesting that evasion of innate immunity may be a significant, ongoing driving force for SARS-CoV-2 evolution. These findings have implications for the increased transmissibility and/or lethality of emerging variants and highlight the interferon subtypes that may be most successful in the treatment of early infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据