4.3 Article

Simulation of turbulence flow in OpenFOAM using the large eddy simulation model

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089221109736

关键词

Large eddy simulation; turbulence; OpenFOAM; turbulence kinetic energy

资金

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turbulent flow is characterized by unpredictable fluctuations in pressure and flow velocity. Turbulence modeling aims to predict time-averaged velocity, turbulence kinetic energy, and pressure. This study analyzes turbulence kinetic energy using an LES model and examines the pressure, fluctuations, and mean velocity caused by turbulence.
Turbulent flow in fluid dynamics is used to describe fluid motion characterized by unpredictable fluctuations in pressure and flow velocity. Turbulence is generated when an area of fluid flow has an excessive amount of kinetic energy, which exceeds the damping impact of the viscosity of a fluid. The primary goal of turbulence modeling is to establish a mathematical model to predict time-averaged velocity, turbulence kinetic energy, and pressure rather than compute the fully turbulent flow pattern as a function of time, as is done in large eddy simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations. Computationally solving the Navier-Stokes equation of motion to simulate turbulent flows necessitates resolving a wide range of length scales and times, all of which impact the flow field. The current study is concerned with the investigation of turbulence kinetic energy through the use of an LES model. The kinetic energy caused by turbulence is analyzed at the outlet and inlet. Along with the pressure, the fluctuations, as well as the mean velocity at the outlet and inlet, are examined. The C++-based programming is done to compute the turbulent flow in OpenFOAM. The computations made in OpenFOAM and Python show great agreement. For a better understanding of readers, graphs and animation are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据