4.4 Article

Hierarchical hybrid trajectory planning for autonomous vehicle considering multiple road types

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544070221107224

关键词

Autonomous vehicle; trajectory planning; improved A* algorithm; quintic polynomial; multiple road types; lane selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel hybrid trajectory planning method that combines A* algorithm and quintic polynomial for autonomous vehicles. The method consists of two layers: an upper layer that uses an improved A* algorithm to search for feasible paths based on various factors, and a lower layer that utilizes segmented quintic polynomial to smooth the trajectory. Experimental results show that the proposed method ensures safe and adaptable trajectory planning in complex scenarios.
This paper combines A* algorithm and quintic polynomial to propose a novel hybrid trajectory planning method that can be used on both structured and unstructured roads for autonomous vehicle. The architecture of our approach can be generally divided into two layers. In the upper level, an improved A* algorithm is adopted to search for a feasible path as a reference based on the indication of global path, static and dynamic obstacles, road conditions and traffic rules. Particularly, relating to the road type, the evaluation functions are appropriately selected. According to this reference path, the relative position of the vehicle to the obstacles is evaluated. Hence, the target vehicle velocity and related position can be determined, and the desired velocity curve is then generated by a cubic polynomial. In the lower level, a segmented quintic polynomial is utilized for smooth the trajectory. Finally, the proposed method has been validated via Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) and real-vehicle tests. The experimental results show that it can not only ensure a safe, curvature-continuous and kinodynamically feasible trajectory planning, but also own good adaptability to complex scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据