4.7 Article

Productive performance, perching behavior, keel bone and other health aspects in dual-purpose compared to conventional laying hens

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 101, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102095

关键词

keel bone damage; dual-purpose chicken; laying hen; perching; animal welfare

资金

  1. [28RZ3-72.050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared dual-purpose chickens with conventional laying chickens in terms of performance, animal welfare, and perching behavior. Dual-purpose chickens performed better in some aspects, but also had issues such as keel bone damage.
Several alternatives to avoid killing male day-old chicks are available. One of these alternatives is to keep dual-purpose chicken strains. The aim of this study was to compare dual-purpose hens (Lohmann Dual, LD) with conventional laying hens (Lohmann Tradition, LT) in terms of performance, animal welfare parameters such as keel bone state and foot pad derma-titis, and perching behavior. We expected a generally equal or even better performance of the dual-purpose hens except for laying performance. Four hundred female day-old chicks were housed in 6 pens (3 pens per strain) and reared until 54 wk of age. Each pen offered a littered area, elevated slatted manure pit, elevated wooden frame with perches or grids and nest boxes on the manure pit. The wooden frame was alternately equipped with perches or grids. The elevated manure pit as well as the elevated structure was accessible via ramp. Productive performance parameters like mortality, total number of eggs and body weight were assessed periodi-cally. In week 49, 132 hens (66 hens per strain) were randomly selected for radiography of the keel bone and assessment of plumage and foot pad state. Perch-ing behavior was analyzed via scan sampling during rearing and laying period, respectively. Statistical ana-lyzes were done with Linear Mixed Effect Model and General Linear Mixed Model. LD had a higher radio-graphic density than LT hens (P = 0.0016), other keel bone parameters (fracture score, P = 0.36; deforma-tion, P = 0.83) showed no differences. The vast major-ity of fractures occurring in both strains were located in the caudal part of the keel bone. During the laying period, usage of elevated structures was higher with grids compared to perches (P < 0.001) and in LD com-pared to LT (P = 0.01). Some animal welfare prob-lems were less frequent in LD compared to LT hens while other problems did not differ between the 2 strains or were even more frequent in LD hens. Grids may be more suitable as resting area than perches and may possibly help to decrease the prevalence of keel bone damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据