4.7 Article

Durable flame-retardant cotton fabrics with tannic acid complexed by various metal ions

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109997

关键词

Flame retardancy; Biomass; Metal complexes; Durability; Cotton fabric

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U19A2045, 51991351, 52122302, 51790504]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal ions coordinated with biomass tannin and tartar emetic were used to prepare durable flame-retardant cotton fabrics. The Ca2+ and Zn2+ systems showed better flame retardant effects than Fe2+, Co2+, and Ni2+. Through tracking the catalytic carbonization process, the study provides insight into the durable flame-retardant mechanism of biomass TA-metal complexes.
In this paper, a variety of metal ions (Ca2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) were used to coordinate biomass tannin (TA) and tartar emetic (TE) to prepare durable flame-retardant cotton fabrics. All the obtained TATEMe systems endowed cotton fabrics with highly durable flame retardancy, while different metal ions in the system contributed to different flame retardant effects. The Ca2+ and Zn2+ flame-retardant systems showed much better smoldering performances in comparison with Fe2+, Co2+, and Ni2+-containing coatings. Further, the catalytic carbonization process of different metal ions on biomass TA was tracked, the material pyrolysis process was revealed, and the durable flame-retardant mechanism of biomass TA-metal complexes was clarified. The Ca2+ flame-retardant system promoted the release of CO2 and the formation of graphitized carbon in both the gas phase and the condensed phase. And Zn2+ showed a better promotion effect on graphitized carbon in the condensed phase than those of Fe2+, Co2+, and Ni2+. This work provides a reference for the research of metal ion catalyzed carbonization flame retardancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据