4.7 Article

Effect of Agave americana fibers used as reinforcement in the preparation of composites based on recycled PVC

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 7222-7231

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26785

关键词

biopolymers; mechanical properties; polymer composites; recycling; thermal properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on the preparation and characterization of a new composite material made from a thermoplastic polymer and a vegetal fiber. The aim is to optimize the adhesion between the fiber and the recycled PVC matrix through surface modification. Experimental results showed that the best method for fiber treatment involved an alkaline treatment followed by a reaction with acetic anhydride. The prepared composites with varying proportions of modified agave fibers exhibited improved mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties.
This work deals with the preparation and the study of a new composite obtained from a thermoplastic polymer and a vegetal fiber. The polymer used is a recycled polyvinylchloride (PVC) and the fiber used was extracted from Agave americana, a plant which grows easily under Mediterranean type climates. Prior chemical treatment of the extracted fiber was necessary to modify the surface of the fiber in order to optimize the adhesion between this fiber and the recycled PVC during the preparation of composites from these materials. For this purpose, our investigations led us to attempt various reactions modification of the surface fiber. The method that gave the best results consists of an alkaline treatment followed by a reaction with acetic anhydride. Once completed chemicals treatments of fiber, the material is mixed with the recycled PVC which serves as a matrix to prepare composites at varying rates from 5% to 30% by weight of agave modified fibers. The effects of the incorporation of raw and processed agave fibers on the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of PVC/agave fiber composites were examined and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据