Clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding management during anticoagulation therapy

Background Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is not an uncommon complication of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy that requires medication cessation. However, drug cessation may cause fatal stroke or systemic embolization in patients at high thromboembolic risk. Here we sought to find an appropriate anticoagulation cessation strategy in cases of GI bleeding during OAC therapy. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed between 2010 and 2018. Patients were enrolled if the following three consecutive conditions were met: 1) electrocardiography electrocardiography-proven atrial fibrillation; 2) OAC therapy; and 3) GI bleeding. We divided the drug cessation strategy into the continuation and discontinuation groups. During 1-year follow-up, the rates of major thromboembolic and rebleeding events were calculated. Results One hundred and forty-six patients (continuation [n = 54] vs. discontinuation [n = 92] group) were enrolled. Patients in the discontinuation group were more likely to be older (69.8 +/- 9.0 yrs vs. 74.9 +/- 8.9 yrs, p = 0.001), while patients in the continuation group were more likely to have undergone cardiac valve surgery (51.9% vs. 20.7%, p<0.001). The presence of a mechanical mitral valve was a determinant of continuation strategy (38.9% vs. 7.5%, p<0.001). However, the mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (3.4 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.6, p = 0.010) and Glas-gow-Blatchford (8.0 +/- 2.4 vs. 8.9 +/- 2.5, p = 0.037) scores were higher in the discontinuation group. Two major embolic strokes occurred in each group (3.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.585). Four of 54 (7.4%) and five of 92 (5.4%) patients had rebleeding events during follow-up (p = 0.632). One embolic event in the continuation group and one rebleeding event in the discontinuation group were fatal. The Glasgow-Blatchford score was a predictor of 1-year rebleeding events (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.20; p = 0.028). The high CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score showed a strong trend (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.92-3.20; p = 0.089) in 1-year thromboembolic events. Conclusion No single risk factor or drug cessation strategy was attributed to adverse clinical events after GI bleeding. The risk of future thrombotic or rebleeding events should be individualized and controlled for based on a pre-existing stratification system.

Automated summary

This study aimed to find an appropriate anticoagulation cessation strategy in cases of gastrointestinal bleeding during oral anticoagulation therapy. The results showed that no single risk factor or drug cessation strategy was attributed to adverse clinical events. Therefore, future treatment should be individualized and controlled based on personalized risk assessment.