4.6 Article

Preparation of acute midbrain slices containing the superior colliculus and periaqueductal Gray for patch-clamp recordings

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271832

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship [214352/Z/18/Z]
  2. Sainsbury Wellcome Centre Core Grant from the Gatsby Charitable Foundation [090843/F/09/Z, 203729/Z/16/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [203729/Z/16/Z, 214352/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This protocol provides a practical guide for preparing acute coronal slices from the midbrain of young adult mice and offers various applications for further experiments. The protocol also includes troubleshooting advice and suggestions for maintaining equipment.
This protocol is a practical guide for preparing acute coronal slices from the midbrain of young adult mice for electrophysiology experiments. It describes two different sets of solutions with their respective incubation strategies and two alternative procedures for brain extraction: decapitation under terminal isoflurane anaesthesia and intracardial perfusion with artificial cerebrospinal fluid under terminal isoflurane anaesthesia. Slices can be prepared from wild-type mice as well as from mice that have been genetically modified or transfected with viral constructs to label subsets of cells. The preparation can be used to investigate the electrophysiological properties of midbrain neurons in combination with pharmacology, opto- and chemogenetic manipulations, and calcium imaging; which can be followed by morphological reconstruction, immunohistochemistry, or single-cell transcriptomics. The protocol also provides a detailed list of materials and reagents including the design for a low-cost and easy to assemble 3D printed slice recovery chamber, general advice for troubleshooting common issues leading to suboptimal slice quality, and some suggestions to ensure good maintenance of a patch-clamp rig.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据