4.6 Article

A network analysis of problematic smartphone use in Japanese young adults

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272803

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI-the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science-JSPS [JP16H06403, JP20H01773]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development -AMED [JP19dk0307073, JP21wm0425010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the overall network structure of problematic smartphone use symptoms assessed by SAS-SV and identified the crucial items in the network. The results indicated that withdrawal symptom and preoccupation symptom played central roles in the network of problematic smartphone use in young adults, consistent with a previous study on school-age children.
Background We aimed to explore the overall network structure of problematic smartphone use symptoms assessed by smartphone addiction scale-short version (SAS-SV) and to identify which items could play important roles in the network. Methods 487 college and university students filled out the study questionnaire, including SAS-SV. We constructed a regularized partial correlation network among the 10 items of SAS-SV. We calculated three indices of node centrality: strength, closeness, and betweenness, to quantify the importance of each SAS-SV item. Results We identified 34 edges in the estimated network. In the given network, one item pertaining to withdrawal symptom hadthe highest strength and high closeness centrality. Additionally, one item related to preoccupation was also found to have high centrality indices. Conclusion Our results indicating the central role of one withdrawal symptom and one preoccupation symptom in the symptom network of problematic smartphone use in young adults were in line with a previous study targeting school-age children. Longitudinal study designs are required to elicit the role of these central items on the formation and maintenance of this behavioral problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据