4.6 Review

Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for the management of dyslipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269531

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Saroglitazar in patients with dyslipidemia. The results showed that Saroglitazar effectively reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol without causing adverse effects. This suggests that Saroglitazar is an effective and safe therapeutic option for improving dyslipidemia.
Background and objective Saroglitazar is a newer antidiabetic agent approved to manage dyslipidemia. The objective is tevaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of saroglitazar in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar from the inception until January 2022. Interventional studies comparing the anti-hyperlipidaemic effect and safety of saroglitazar with or without a control group(s) were included. The efficacy of saroglitazar was assessed concerning its effect on total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, and non-HDL cholesterol. The effects on serum creatinine levels, bodyweight reduction, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were considered to be safety endpoint.The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results A total of six studies with 581 adults with a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 62.6 years were included in this study. A significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed with saroglitazar 4 mg therapy compared to saroglitazar 2 mg [standardized mean difference (SMD): - 0.23 mg/dL, 95% CI: - 0.47 to 0.00; p = 0.05; 2 studies], and control [SMD: - 0.36 mg/dL, 95% CI - 0.59 to -0.12; p = 0.0026; 3 studies]. Also, a significant decrease in the total cholesterol was observed with saroglitazar 4 mg therapy compared to saroglitazar 2 mg [SMD - 0.28 mg/dL, 95% CI: - 0.52 to -0.04; p < 0.01; 2 studies], and control [SMD - 0.49 mg/dL, 95% CI: - 0.72 to -0.26; p < 0.0001; 3 studies]. Saroglitazar was not associated with adverse effects such as increase in serum creatinine levels, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase and bodyweight reduction. Conclusion Saroglitazar appeared to be an effective and safer therapeutic option for improving dyslipidemia in patients. However, comparative studies of saroglitazar with the other pharmacological agents are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据