4.6 Article

Responses of human colon and breast adenocarcinoma cell lines (LoVo, MCF7) and non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells (MCF-10A) to the acellular fraction of packed red blood cells in the presence and absence of cisplatin

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271193

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perioperative blood transfusion in colorectal and some other cancer patients has been associated with increased risk for recurrence, but the exact mechanism is unclear. This study found that the acellular fraction of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), especially from fresh PRBCs, can inhibit the viability and proliferation of tumor cells, but has no effect on non-tumor cells. Additionally, it can increase drug resistance in non-tumor cells.
Perioperative blood transfusion in colorectal and some other cancer patients has been linked to the increased risk for recurrence, but a causal mechanism remains unclear. During the preparation and storage of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) bio-active substances accumulate in the acellular fraction (supernatant). Viability, proliferation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and DNA damage of colon (LoVo) and breast (MCF7) adenocarcinoma cells and non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cell line were determined in response to the supernatants of fresh and long-stored (day 42) PRBCs, leukoreduced (LR) or non-leukoreduced (NLR). The effect of supernatants on the cytotoxicity of cisplatin (cisPt) towards the cells was also examined. Supernatants, especially from a day 1 PRBCs, both LR and NLR, reduced the viability and inhibited proliferation of tumor cells (LoVo, MCF7), accompanying by the excessive ROS production, but these were not the case in MCF-10A. Moreover, supernatants had no effect on the cytotoxicity of cisPt against LoVo and MCF7 cells, while caused increased drug resistance in MCF-10A cells. The findings suggest the acellular fraction of PRBCs does not exhibit any pro-proliferative activity in the cancer cell lines studied. However, these are pioneering issues and require further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据