4.6 Article

Determining factors of participation and success rates in research funding competitions: Case study

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Neurosciences

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Bettina J. Casad et al.

Summary: The underrepresentation of women in STEM fields, along with negative gender stereotypes, lack of social capital, and hostile academic climates, hinders women's career opportunities and contributes to their departure from academia. Interventions such as recruiting diverse applicants, promoting women faculty networks, and educating male faculty on gender bias are recommended to address these issues and advance gender equality in STEM.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Gender bias in the allocation of student grants

Marjolijn N. Wijnen et al.

Summary: This study investigated the disadvantage female university students face when receiving their first grant in their scientific career, revealing that women had a lower success rate compared to men when applying to LISF. Even when gender-related information was removed, female applicants still had lower success rates. These findings emphasize the need to address gender biases at their core.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2021)

Article Management

The funding-productivity-gender nexus in science, a multistage analysis

Cornelia Lawson et al.

Summary: This study contributes to the literature by exploring the gender gap in research funding and scientific productivity in science. Through an analysis of a specific sample and model, the study identifies gender differences at different stages and the moderating effect of teaching, administration, and child care time on gender impact. The study also reveals a 'motherhood penalty' effect for female academics with young children who did not apply for funding, and finds that, after controlling for children, female researchers are less productive in terms of publications, but not in terms of research quality or impact.

RESEARCH POLICY (2021)

Review Education & Educational Research

The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions

Sayaka Sato et al.

Summary: The literature on gender inequality in academia highlights the challenges faced by female researchers during their academic careers, especially in the peer review process of research grant funding. While some argue for the existence of gender bias, others demonstrate gender equality in these processes. More comprehensive research is needed to further the debate, addressing individual and systemic biases as well as global social barriers. Special attention should be given to the critical methodological challenges in examining gender biases during grant peer reviews. The paper concludes by suggesting directions for future research to improve grant funding opportunities and career paths for female researchers.

HIGHER EDUCATION (2021)

Article Education & Educational Research

Gendered inequalities in competitive grant funding: an overlooked dimension of gendered power relations in academia

Finnborg S. Steinthorsdottir et al.

HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (2020)

Article Information Science & Library Science

European Research Council: excellence and leadership over time from a gender perspective

Nuria Bautista-Puig et al.

RESEARCH EVALUATION (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Gender and language use in scientific grant writing

Mackenzie Urquhart-Cronish et al.

FACETS (2019)

Article Environmental Studies

Performance-based research funding in EU Member States-a comparative assessment

Thomas Zacharewicz et al.

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2019)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Toward predicting research proposal success

Kevin W. Boyack et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

Robyn Tamblyn et al.

CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Matthew effect in science funding

Thijs Bol et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)

Article Education & Educational Research

Dissecting a Gendered Organization: Implications for Career Trajectories for Mid-Career Faculty Women in STEM

Jeni Hart

JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION (2016)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science

Paul Boyle et al.

NATURE (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands

Romy van der Lee et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s

Anne E. Lincoln et al.

SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE (2012)

Article Education, Scientific Disciplines

Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs

Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus et al.

ACADEMIC MEDICINE (2011)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

Lutz Bornmann et al.

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance

Matthew R. E. Symonds et al.

PLOS ONE (2006)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations

H Etzkowitz

SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES (2003)