4.6 Article

The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270822

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rise of social media and the Covid-19 pandemic have led to a paradigm shift in presidential campaigns in Iran, moving from the physical world to social media. Farsi Twitter has become the platform for creating political content. The discussion network of the 2021 election is highly polarized, with one pole consisting of supporters favoring the election and the other pole being anti-voters who endorse boycotting the election. These two poles form echo chambers with little interaction. Additionally, there is a significant presence of bot activity among the most influential users in all involved communities.
The rise of social media accompanied by the Covid-19 Pandemic has instigated a shift in paradigm in the presidential campaigns in Iran from the real world to social media. Unlike previous presidential elections, there was a decrease in physical events and advertisements for the candidates; in turn, the online presence of presidential candidates is significantly increased. Farsi Twitter played a specific role in this matter, as it became the platform for creating political content. In this study, we found traces of organizational activities in Farsi Twitter, and our investigations reveal that the discussion network of the 2021 election is heterogeneous and highly polarized. However, unlike many other documented election cases in Iran and around the globe, communities of candidates' supporters are very close in one pole, and the other pole is for Anti-voters who endorse boycotting the election. With almost no reciprocal ties, these two poles form two echo chambers, one favoring the election and the other for voter suppression. Furthermore, a high presence of bot activity is observed among the most influential users in all of the involved communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据