4.5 Article

Mechanism study on gliding arc (GA) plasma reforming: A combination approach of experiment and modeling

期刊

PLASMA PROCESSES AND POLYMERS
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppap.202200077

关键词

dry reforming; gliding arc; kinetics simulation; plasma diagnostics; plasma reforming

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11675031, 11975063, 11975069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to gain a deep understanding of the reaction kinetics of gliding arc plasma reforming through a combination of simulation and experiment. By adding a thermodynamic module and conservation equations of mass and energy into the traditional 0D plasma kinetics model, an effective link between experimental diagnostics and reaction kinetics simulation is established for dry reforming of CH4 in gliding arc plasma. The plasma parameters of gliding arc are experimentally diagnosed as an electron density of 1.4 x 10(14) cm(-3), an electron temperature of 1.5 eV, and an arc gas temperature of 2500 K. The kinetics simulation is conducted based on the obtained plasma parameters and verified by the online analysis of gaseous products. As a result, the reaction mechanism is revealed by the reliable model.
Aiming at a deep understanding of the reaction kinetics of gliding arc (GA) plasma reforming, a new approach to combining simulation and experiment is reported. By adding thermodynamic module and conservation equations of mass and energy into the conventional 0D plasma kinetics model, an effective link between experimental diagnostics and reaction kinetics simulation is established for dry reforming of CH4 in GA plasma. The GA plasma parameters are diagnosed experimentally as electron density of 1.4 x 10(14) cm(-3), electron temperature of 1.5 eV, and arc gas temperature of 2500 K. The kinetics simulation is implemented based on the obtained plasma parameters and verified by the online analysis of gaseous products. Consequently, the reaction mechanism is revealed by the reliable model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据