4.3 Article

Two plasmon decay instability stimulated by large-incidence-angle laser in inertial confinement fusion

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac7b47

关键词

inertial confinement fusion; laser plasma instability; two plasmon decay instability; large incidence angle

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA25050400, XDA25010200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [12175229, 11621202]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two-plasmon-decay instability (TPD) in the large-incidence-angle regime is studied using fluid and particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. It is found that the TPD threshold can be significantly lower within a narrow incidence angle range close to 60 degrees compared to the normal-incidence threshold. A threshold formula is proposed and verified through simulations. The simulations show significant laser absorption and energetic electron generation once TPD is excited. The incident angle and laser spot size have a significant influence on TPD in the large-incidence-angle regime, posing preheating risks to inertial confinement fusion.
The two-plasmon-decay instability (TPD) in the large-incidence-angle regime is studied via fluid and particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. It is found that the TPD threshold in this regime within a narrow incidence angle range close to 60(circle) can be orders of magnitude lower than the normal-incidence threshold. A threshold formula is proposed for this regime and is verified by fluid and PIC simulations. PIC simulations show significant laser absorption and energetic electron generation once TPD is excited. The incident angle and the laser spot size have a significant influence on the TPD in the large-incidence-angle regime. The low threshold and significant hot electron generation in this regime pose potentially unexpected preheating risks to inertial confinement fusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据