4.6 Article

A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity

期刊

PLANT METHODS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x

关键词

Image analysis; Disease symptoms; ImageJ; Machine learning; Cassava bacterial blight

资金

  1. National Science Foundation GRFP [DGE-2139839, DGE-1745038]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1125410]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1125410] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two image analysis methods were developed and tested for their application in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem. The results showed that both methods are capable of accurately segmenting lesions and measuring differences between treatment types.
Background Methods to accurately quantify disease severity are fundamental to plant pathogen interaction studies. Commonly used methods include visual scoring of disease symptoms, tracking pathogen growth in planta over time, and various assays that detect plant defense responses. Several image-based methods for phenotyping of plant disease symptoms have also been developed. Each of these methods has different advantages and limitations which should be carefully considered when choosing an approach and interpreting the results. Results In this paper, we developed two image analysis methods and tested their ability to quantify different aspects of disease lesions in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem. The first method uses ImageJ, an open-source platform widely used in the biological sciences. The second method is a few-shot support vector machine learning tool that uses a classifier file trained with five representative infected leaf images for lesion recognition. Cassava leaves were syringe infiltrated with wildtype Xanthomonas, a Xanthomonas mutant with decreased virulence, and mock treatments. Digital images of infected leaves were captured overtime using a Raspberry Pi camera. The image analysis methods were analyzed and compared for the ability to segment the lesion from the background and accurately capture and measure differences between the treatment types. Conclusions Both image analysis methods presented in this paper allow for accurate segmentation of disease lesions from the non-infected plant. Specifically, at 4-, 6-, and 9-days post inoculation (DPI), both methods provided quantitative differences in disease symptoms between different treatment types. Thus, either method could be applied to extract information about disease severity. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据