4.7 Article

Cytogenetic Characterization and Molecular Marker Development for a Wheat-T. boeoticum 4Ab (4B) Disomic Substitution Line with Stripe Rust Resistance

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 125-130

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0865-RE

关键词

55K SNP; FISH; GISH; SLAF-seq; stripe rust; substitution line; Triticum boeoticum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wheat-T. boeoticum substitution line Z1889 was identified and specific molecular markers were developed for the detection of the 4A(b) chromosome and wheat breeding.
Triticum boeoticum (2n = 2x = 14, A(b)A(b)) is an important relative of wheat. This species tolerates many different types of environmental stresses, including drought, salt, and pathogenic infection, and is lower in dietary fiber and higher in antioxidants, protein (15 to 18%), lipids, and trace elements than common wheat. However, the gene transfer rate from this species to common wheat is low, and few species-specific molecular markers are available. In this study, the wheat-T. boeoticum substitution line Z1889, derived from a cross between the common wheat cultivar Crocus and T. boeoticum line G52, was identified using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, multicolor genomic in situ hybridization, and a 55K single-nucleotide polymorphism array. Z1889 was revealed to be a 4A(b) (4B) substitution line with a high degree of resistance to stripe rust pathogen strains prevalent in China. In addition, 22 4A(b) chromosome-specific molecular markers and 11 T. boeoticum genome-specific molecular markers were developed from 1,145 4A(b) chromosome-specific fragments by comparing the sequences generated by specific-length amplified fragment sequencing, with an efficiency of up to 55.0%. Furthermore, the specificity of these markers was verified in four species containing the A(b) genome. These markers not only can be used for the detection of the 4A(b) chromosome but also provide a basis for molecular marker-assisted, selection-based breeding in wheat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据