4.7 Article

Induced Defense Response in Soybean to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Using Wuyiencin from Streptomyces albulus CK-15

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-03-22-0582-RE

关键词

callose deposition; defense-related enzyme; hormone signaling pathways; plant defense; wuyiencin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the potential application of wuyiencin in inducing defense responses in soybean against S. sclerotiorum. The results showed that wuyiencin treatment reduced lesion size and increased antioxidant enzyme activity in soybean plants. It also increased the activity of several defense enzymes, suggesting its involvement in soybean defense responses to S. sclerotiorum.
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib) de Bary, a destructive fungal pathogen with an extensive host range, causes major economic losses to crop production activities globally. Streptomyces spp. produce secondary metabolites with diverse structures and biological activities with potential applications in the control of crop disease. This study explored the potential application of wuyiencin, a secondary metabolite of Streptomyces albulus CK-15, to induce defense responses in soybean against S. sclerotiorum. Lesion size was reduced by nearly 60% in wuyiencin-treated soybean plants compared with plants infected with S. sclerotiorum only in greenhouse experiments. Wuyiencin induced callose deposition at 6 h postinoculation and increased reactive-oxygen-scavenging enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase. Moreover, wuyiencin inoculated before S. sclerotiorum infection significantly increased polyphenol oxidase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, chitinase, and beta-1,3-glucanase activity, suggesting their involvement in soybean defense responses to S. sclerotiorum. Further, qRT-PCR results showed expression levels of the hormone signaling markers CO11, MYC2, PR4, PR1, NPR1, and ERF1 were upregulated in infected leaves treated with wuyiencin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据