4.7 Article

Improving pre-harvest sprouting resistance in rice by editing OsABA8ox using CRISPR/Cas9

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2107-2110

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02917-3

关键词

Abscisic acid; Genome editing; Oryza sativa; Seed dormancy

资金

  1. National Transformation Science and Technology Program [2016ZX08001006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871712]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFD1200504]
  4. National Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20212010]
  5. Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Japonica Rice in Mid-lower Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China
  6. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production
  7. Southern Japonica Rice Research and Development Co. LTD.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knocking out the OsABA8ox gene in rice improves pre-harvest spouting resistance without affecting rice yield. The high levels of ABA in the seeds after gene knockout affect the metabolic processes and enhance seed dormancy.
Key message Knock out OsABA8ox helps improve pre-harvest spouting resistance and do not affect rice yield. Pre-harvest sprouting(PHS) is a phenomenon that the seeds of crops germinate preharvest, which reduces the yield and quality of rice. Abscisic acid(ABA) is one of the phytohormones that promotes seed dormancy. ABA8' hydroxylase is the main enzyme that can catabolism ABA in plant. There are three genes that encode ABA8' hydroxylase in rice, named OsABA8ox1, OsABA8ox2 and OsABA8ox3. In this study, we use CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology to target these three genes in Ningjing6 and find that the knockout transgenic lines are all significantly strengthen in seed dormancy and have no effect on the yield. By a series of quantitative experiments, we consider that after knock out OsABA8ox, the high endogenous ABA level will influence the ABA signal which suppress the substantial and energy metabolism in the seeds, and finally led to higher dormancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据