4.2 Article

Theoretical determination of vapour-liquid equilibrium pressure and vaporisation enthalpy of rubidium in the temperature range of 700 K-2017 K based on a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state

期刊

PHASE TRANSITIONS
卷 95, 期 10, 页码 726-740

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01411594.2022.2109470

关键词

Equation of state; Maxwell construction; rubidium; vaporisation enthalpy; vapour-liquid equilibrium; vapour pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state (m-RK EoS) with four parameters is used to determine the vapor-liquid equilibrium pressure of rubidium over a temperature range of 700 K to 2017 K. The obtained values are consistent with literature values. Correlations for the temperature-dependence of rubidium vapor pressure are obtained through least square analysis based on the obtained data. It is also found that the curvature of the reduced vapor pressure curve for rubidium has a maximum at 1208.80 K. The vaporization enthalpy of rubidium is determined from the proposed correlation and has reasonable accuracy within the temperature range of 700 K to 1400 K.
Based on a four-parameter modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state (m-RK EoS), the vapour-liquid equilibrium pressure of rubidium over a temperature range of 700 K-2017 K is determined using Maxwell's equal area construction. The obtained values of vapour pressure of rubidium agree with the literature values. In this work, the vapour pressure precision is taken as 10(-5) Pa which is, in fact tuneable, depending upon the accuracy requirement. Correlations for the temperature-dependence of vapour pressure of rubidium are obtained through least square analysis based on the obtained vapour pressure data. Also, the curvature of the obtained reduced vapour pressure curve for rubidium is found to have a maximum at 1208.80 K. Moreover, the vaporisation enthalpy of rubidium is determined from the proposed vapour pressure correlation and has reasonable accuracy in the temperature of 700 K-1400 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据