4.7 Article

Effect of Residual Bacteria on the Outcome of Pulp Regeneration In Vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 100-106

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034516671499

关键词

regeneration; endodontics; stem cell(s); mineralized tissue/development; antibiotics; microbiology

资金

  1. American Association of Endodontists Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is not known to what extent residual infection may interfere with the success of pulp regeneration procedures. The aim of this study was to determine, radiographically and histologically, the effect of residual bacteria on the outcome of pulp regeneration mediated by a tissue-engineered construct as compared with traditional revascularization. Periapical lesions were induced in 24 canine teeth of 6 ferrets. After disinfection with 1.25% NaOCl and triple antibiotic paste, ferret dental pulp stem cells, encapsulated in a hydrogel scaffold, were injected into half the experimental teeth. The other half were treated with the traditional revascularization protocol with a blood clot scaffold. After 3 mo, block sections of the canine teeth were imaged radiographically and processed for histologic and histobacteriologic analyses. Associations between variables of interest were evaluated through mixed effects regression models. There were no significant differences between the 2 experimental groups in radiographic root development (P > 0.05). There was a significant association between the presence of persistent periapical radiolucency and root wall thickness (P = 0.02). There was also no significant difference in histologic findings between the 2 experimental groups (P > 0.05). The presence of residual bacteria was significantly associated with lack of radiographic growth (P < 0.001). The amount of dentin-associated mineralized tissue formed in teeth with residual bacteria was significantly less than in teeth with no residual bacteria (P < 0.001). Residual bacteria have a critical negative effect on the outcome of regenerative endodontic procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据