4.4 Article

Diagnostic tests and subtypes of dysfunctional breathing in children with unexplained exertional dyspnea

期刊

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
卷 57, 期 10, 页码 2428-2436

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26052

关键词

breathing pattern disorder; cardio-pulmonary exercise test; hyperventilation provocation test; hyperventilation syndrome

资金

  1. DMU INNOV'RDB of Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris [2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess whether the Nijmegen questionnaire and hyperventilation provocation test (HVPT) are able to differentiate specific subtypes of dysfunctional breathing and discussed the relevance of the inappropriate hyperventilation subtype itself.
Background Inappropriate hyperventilation during exercise may be a specific subtype of dysfunctional breathing (DB). Objective To assess whether Nijmegen questionnaire and hyperventilation provocation test (HVPT) are able to differentiate inappropriate hyperventilation from other DB subtypes in children with unexplained exertional dyspnea, and normal spirometry and echocardiography. Methods The results were compared between a subgroup of 25 children with inappropriate hyperventilation (increased V'E/V'CO2 slope during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)) and an age and sex matched subgroup of 25 children with DB without hyperventilation (median age, 13.5 years; 36 girls). Anxiety was evaluated using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children questionnaire. Results All children were normocapnic (at rest and peak exercise) and the children with hyperventilation had lower tidal volume/vital capacity on peak exercise (shallow breathing). The Nijmegen score correlated positively with dyspnea during the CPET and the HVPT (p = 0.001 and 0.010, respectively) and with anxiety score (p = 0.022). The proportion of children with a positive Nijmegen score (>= 19) did not differ between hyperventilation (13/25) and no hyperventilation (14/25) groups (p = 0.777). Fractional end-tidal CO2 (FETCO2) at 5-min recovery of the HVPT was < 90% baseline in all children (25/25) of both subgroups. Likewise, there was no significant difference between the two subgroups for other indices of HVPT (FETCO2 at 3-min recovery and symptoms during the test). Conclusion The validity of the Nijmegen questionnaire and the HVPT to discriminate specific subtypes of dysfunctional breathing, as well as the relevance of the inappropriate hyperventilation subtype itself may both be questioned.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据