4.7 Article

Node-Feature Convolution for Graph Convolutional Networks

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108661

关键词

Graph; Representation learning; Graph convolutional networks; Convolutional neural networks

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201706080010]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/R014507/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graph convolutional network (GCN) is an effective neural network model for graph representation learning. This paper proposes a new node-feature convolutional (NFC) layer to tackle the limitations of standard GCN. Experimental results show that NFC-GCN outperforms state-of-the-art methods in node classification.
Graph convolutional network (GCN) is an effective neural network model for graph representation learn-ing. However, standard GCN suffers from three main limitations: (1) most real-world graphs have no regular connectivity and node degrees can range from one to hundreds or thousands, (2) neighboring nodes are aggregated with fixed weights, and (3) node features within a node feature vector are con -sidered equally important. Several extensions have been proposed to tackle the limitations respectively. This paper focuses on tackling all the proposed limitations. Specifically, we propose a new node-feature convolutional (NFC) layer for GCN. The NFC layer first constructs a feature map using features selected and ordered from a fixed number of neighbors. It then performs a convolution operation on this feature map to learn the node representation. In this way, we can learn the usefulness of both individual nodes and individual features from a fixed-size neighborhood. Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that NFC-GCN consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in node classification. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据