4.7 Article

Improved deep convolutional embedded clustering with re-selectable sample training

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108611

关键词

Unsupervised clustering; Deep embedded clustering; Autoencoder; Reliable samples

资金

  1. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX20_1416]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved deep convolutional embedded clustering algorithm (IDCEC) that improves clustering performance by using reliable samples. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms traditional clustering algorithms and state-of-the-art deep clustering algorithms under multiple clustering evaluation metrics.
The deep clustering algorithm can learn the latent features of the embedded subspace, and further realize the clustering of samples in the feature space. The existing deep clustering algorithms mostly integrate neural networks and traditional clustering algorithms. However, for sample sets with many noise points, the effect of the clustering remains unsatisfactory. To address this issue, we propose an improved deep convolutional embedded clustering algorithm using reliable samples (IDCEC) in this paper. The algorithm first uses the convolutional autoencoder to extract features and cluster the samples. Then we select reliable samples with pseudo-labels and pass them to the convolutional neural network for training to get a better clustering model. We construct a new loss function for backpropagation training and implement an unsupervised deep clustering method. To verify the performance of the method proposed in this paper, we conducted experimental tests on standard data sets such as MNIST and USPS. Experimental results show that our method has better performance compared to traditional clustering algorithms and the state-of-the-art deep clustering algorithm under four clustering metrics.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据