4.3 Article

Description of Myxobolus hoabinhensis n. sp. (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae), infecting the trunk muscles of goldfish Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in northern Vietnam

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 121, 期 9, 页码 2495-2502

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07586-5

关键词

Myxobolus; Morphology; Molecular phylogeny; SSU rDNA; Freshwater fish

资金

  1. JSPS RONPAKU program [R12206]
  2. Russian Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation [121030100028-0]
  3. Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources [IEBR DT.08-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During a survey in northern Vietnam, myxospores resembling Myxobolus genus were found in the trunk muscle of wild goldfish. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that this is a new undescribed species.
During a survey of myxosporean parasites of freshwater fishes in northern Vietnam, myxospores resembling those of the genus Myxobolus (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) were found in the trunk muscle of 6 out of 35 specimens (17.14%) of wild goldfish Carassius auratus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). The mature spores were 12.0 +/- 0.4 (11.4 - 12.6) mu m long, 8.5 +/- 0.2 (7.9 - 9.0) mu m wide and 6.1 +/- 0.2 (5.8 - 6.3) mu m thick, containing two pyriform-shaped polar capsules unequal in size. The larger polar capsule was 7.6 +/- 0.3 (7.1 - 8.4) mu m long and 3.5 +/- 0.1 (3.3 - 3.8) mu m wide, and the smaller polar capsule was 6.2 +/- 0.3 (5.5 - 6.7) mu m long and 2.9 +/- 0.2 (2.6 - 3.4) mu m wide. Each polar capsule contained a polar filament with 3-5 coils. A phylogenetic analysis based on the small subunit rDNA (SSU rDNA) sequence revealed that this Myxobolus species forms a distinct branch in the phylogenetic tree sister to Myxobolus artus and Myxobolus cyprini, with DNA sequence similarity at 97.6% to M. artus and 97.5% to M. cyprini. A combination of the morphological characteristics and molecular data suggest that this is an undescribed species, and we propose the name Myxobolus hoabinhensis n. sp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据