4.3 Article

Thecochaos is not a myth: study of the genus Thecochaos (Amoebozoa, Discosea) - a rediscovered group of lobose amoeba, with short SSU gene

期刊

ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 7-24

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-022-00581-9

关键词

Evolution; Molecular phylogeny; Morphological systematics; Phylogenetic position; Species diversity; Taxonomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two species of multinucleate amoebae, belonging to the genus Thecochaos, were rediscovered using single-cell techniques, providing valuable genetic and morphological information. This study highlights the importance of modern single-cell techniques in the study of rare and non-cultivable amoebae species.
Two multinucleate amoebae species, nowadays belonging to the genus Thecochaos, were never seen alive since 1913. Stained preparations deposited with the British Museum of Natural History (London) by E. Penard remain the only material proof of the existence of these organisms. We recently found an amoeba, identified as Thecochaos fibrillosum, in the soil sample originating from Chernevaya taiga soil in South Siberia (Russia). In total, we have got 15 cells of this species; however, using this amount of cells, we performed light- and electron-microscopic study, made permanent stained preparations, obtained SSU rRNA gene sequence using single-cell DNA isolation technique, and performed NGS sequencing to obtain genomic data for multigene analysis. Its SSU gene is unusually short (1586 bp), has significant losses in many laps, and, to the moment, is the shortest one known among Amoebozoa. The SSU sequence of this species robustly groups within the family Thecamoebidae as a sister to Thecamoeba/Sappinia clade. Multigene analysis either supported this position of Thecochaos or suggested its grouping with Sappinia. This study demonstrates that modern single-cell techniques allow correct and complete study and description of rare and almost non-cultivable amoebae species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据