4.3 Article

A widespread commensal loses its identity: suggested taxonomic revision for Indotyphlops braminus (Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae) based on molecular data

期刊

ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 169-183

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-022-00577-5

关键词

Typhlopidae; Hybridization; Phylogenetics; Parthenogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying multiple Indotyphlops lineages from across peninsular India, it was found that the widespread commensal and parthenogenetic Indotyphlops may have a hybrid origin. The research results suggest that this species is separate from I. braminus.
The widespread human commensal blindsnake species Indotyphlops braminus is currently the only known obligate parthenogenetic snake species. It is also known to be triploid. However, much of these data is from specimens collected outside India which is the native range of this species. Polyploidy and parthenogenesis are often associated with hybridization in amphibians and lizards. In this study, we generated nuclear and mitochondrial data from multiple Indotyphlops lineages from across peninsular India and investigated the possible hybrid origin of I. braminus. Species delimitation suggested three putative species, one of which was I. pammeces and the other two morphologically matched I. braminus. One of these was confined to the wet zone (high rainfall areas) while the other was largely distributed in the dry zone. There was wide discordance in the relationships between these lineages across markers and different tree building approaches suggesting past or ongoing geneflow. The statistical test for hybridization also implied geneflow across these three lineages. Furthermore, the dry zone I. braminus appears to be true I. braminus as the topotypic material falls within this clade. These results suggest that the widespread, commensal, and parthenogenetic Indotyphlops is a separate species from I. braminus, and further investigation is required to determine diagnostic morphological characters for a species description.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据