4.6 Article

Dysphagia-related mucositis in children undergoing chemotherapy: The COMEDY pattern

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 2705-2709

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14344

关键词

chemotherapy; children; dysphagia; mucositis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to identify the prevalence of the COMEDY pattern among chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). A retrospective review of 42 medical records of children undergoing chemotherapy revealed that 14.2% of patients exhibited the COMEDY pattern. These patients not only had oral mucosal lesions, but also experienced dysphagia related to non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and pediatric neuro-psychiatric (PNP) issues. Recognizing the COMEDY pattern may be crucial for improving treatment effectiveness.
Objectives Children undergoing chemotherapy can experience dysphagia due to non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Oral mucositis (OM) associated with NERD-dysphagia in children with cancer has recently been defined with the acronym COMEDY (Clenching, Oral Mucositis, closed Eyes, DYsphagia). This study aims to identify the prevalence of the COMEDY pattern among chemotherapy-induced OM. Subjects and methods Forty-two medical records of children undergoing chemotherapy for haemato-oncologic diseases and presenting OM were reviewed. The following data were collected: age, type of haemato-oncologic disease, presence of dysphagia, type of oral mucosal lesions (i.e. traditional oral mucositis or COMEDY pattern), site of oral lesions, ear-nose-throat (ENT) assessment for the indirect signs of NERD and paediatric neuro-psychiatric (PNP) assessment. Results Among 42 children with chemotherapy-related OM, 6 patients (14.2%) showed the COMEDY pattern. Besides the characteristic clinical aspect of the oral mucosa, initially classified as grade II OM, these children suffered from NERD-related dysphagia and PNP issues. Conclusion A COMEDY pattern can occur in a number of cases of chemotherapy-induced OM; recognizing this pattern may improve the effectiveness of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据