4.6 Article

Continuous wave Bessel beams with a strong longitudinal acceleration in free space

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 4060-4063

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.463584

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [308394, 320167]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [308394, 308394, 320167, 320167] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A variety of transversely accelerating optical beams have been extensively studied, while longitudinal acceleration of optical beams in free space has been less explored. In this work, two-component continuous wave Bessel beams with extremely high longitudinal acceleration are created, and the experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions.
A variety of transversely accelerating optical beams, such as Airy, Mathieu, and Weber beams, have been proposed and intensively studied in the past few decades, while longitudinal acceleration of optical beams in free space has been considered much less and mostly for ultrashort optical pulses. In this work, we create two-component continuous wave Bessel beams that exhibit extremely high longitudinal acceleration in free space, with the group velocity changing by a factor of 10 in just a few centimeters of propagation. The beam components are co-propagating interfering optical beams that can have different frequencies and angular spectra. We also demonstrate large-magnitude negative group velocities and zero-group-velocity modes for a two-component beam. The group velocities are measured interferometrically, using a common-path optical interferometer. The measurement results agree well with the theoretical predictions. The presented methods to control and measure the group velocity of light in free space are expected to attract the attention of researchers working on optical interferometry, ultrafast optics, nonlinear optics, and optical tweezers. Published by Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据