4.6 Article

Temperature and external strain sensing with metal-embedded optical fiber sensors for structural health monitoring

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 30, 期 19, 页码 33449-33464

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.459459

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO 2111/11-2, RO 4145/3-2, VO 1487/11-2]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201903170207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, optical fiber with both temperature and strain sensors were embedded into an aluminum cast structure during the casting process. The temperature and strain were decoupled, and the obtained values showed good performance of the metal-embedded optical fiber sensors.
An optical fiber with both temperature and strain fiber Bragg grating sensors were embedded into an aluminum cast structure during the casting process. Temperature and strain calibrations were carried out respectively for the metal-embedded sensors. Temperature and external strain decoupling was further demonstrated in a temperature range from 25 to 80 degrees C and an external strain range from 0 to similar to 110 mu epsilon. With the interpolated temperature measured by two temperature sensors at different positions, the external strain could be decoupled from temperature and thermal strain at the strain sensor. The temperature and external strain values obtained from our embedded optical fiber sensors agreed well with reference values, revealing the good performance of the metal-embedded optical fiber sensors. The difference between the measured values and the reference values are within +/- 5 mu epsilon for external strain and +/- 1 degrees C for temperature. With only a single fiber, the in-situ temperature and external strain information in the aluminum structure can be monitored in real time, representing an important step towards fiber-optic smart casts. Our investigation demonstrates that embedded optical fiber sensors can be a promising method for structural health monitoring of metallic structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据