4.3 Article

Effect of Dietary Methylseleninic Acid and Se-Methylselenocysteine on Carcinogen-Induced, Androgen-Promoted Prostate Carcinogenesis in Rats

期刊

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 10, 页码 3761-3768

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2093387

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA172169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selenomethionine did not prevent prostate cancer in both clinical and rat models, but the next-generation selenium forms MSeA and MSeC showed inhibitory effects in mouse models and human prostate cancer cells. However, in a chemically induced-androgen promoted carcinogenesis rat model where selenomethionine was not effective, MSeA and MSeC feeding did not show preventive effects. Possible reasons for the contrast between these findings could be differences in carcinogenic mechanisms, selenium dosage, delivery mode, and pharmacokinetics, or fundamental differences in selenium metabolism between rats and mice.
Selenomethionine (SeMet) did not prevent prostate cancer in the SELECT trial and in two hormone-driven rat models. However, we have shown that daily oral bolus administration of next-generation selenium forms, methylseleninic acid (MSeA) and Se-methylselenocysteine (MSeC) at 3 mg Se/kg body weight, inhibits prostate carcinogenesis in the TRAMP and pten-deficient mouse models and In Vivo growth of human prostate cancer cells. Here, we determined whether these Se forms prevent prostate cancer in a chemically induced-androgen promoted carcinogenesis rat model in which SeMet was not preventive. WU rats were treated with methylnitrosourea, and one week later, slow-release testosterone implants when they were randomized to groups fed AIN-93M diet supplemented with 3 ppm selenium as MSeA or MSeC or control diet. Mean survival, tumor incidence in all accessory sex glands combined (dorsolateral and anterior prostate plus seminal vesicle) and the incidence of tumors confined to dorsolateral and/or anterior prostate were not statistically significantly different among the groups. Thus, MSeA and MSeC feeding was not preventive in this model. The contrast with the inhibitory effects of MSeA and MSeC in mouse models may be due to differences in carcinogenic mechanisms, selenium dosage, delivery mode, and pharmacokinetics or fundamental rat-mouse differences in selenium metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据