4.6 Article

Internality of generalized averaged Gauss quadrature rules and truncated variants for modified Chebyshev measures of the third and fourth kinds

期刊

NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 523-544

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-022-01385-w

关键词

Gauss quadrature; Averaged Gauss quadrature rule; Generalized averaged Gauss quadrature rule; Truncated generalized averaged Gauss quadrature rule; Internality of quadrature rules; Modified Chebyshev measure of the third and fourth kinds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the internal property of averaged and generalized averaged Gauss quadrature formulas for modified Chebyshev measures of the third and fourth kinds, and demonstrates that truncated variants have internal property.
Gauss quadrature rules are commonly used to approximate integrals determined by a measure with support on a real interval. These rules are known to be internal, i.e., their nodes are in the convex hull of the support of the measure. This allows the application of Gauss rules also when the integrand only is defined on the convex hull of the support of the measure. It is important to be able to estimate the quadrature error that is incurred when using a Gauss rule. Averaged and generalized averaged Gauss quadrature formulas are helpful in this respect. Given an n-node Gauss rule, the associated (2n + 1)-node averaged and generalized averaged Gauss rules are easy to compute. However, they are not guaranteed to be internal, and in this situation they cannot be used for integrands that are defined on the convex hull of the support of the measure only. This paper investigates whether averaged and generalized averaged Gauss quadrature formulas for modified Chebyshev measures of the third and fourth kinds are internal. We show that in situations when this is not the case, truncated variants, that use fewer nodes, are internal. Computed examples that illustrate the performance of the quadrature rules discussed are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据