4.8 Article

N4-acetylcytidine regulates the replication and pathogenicity of enterovirus 71

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 16, 页码 9339-9354

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac675

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970168, 32000114]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672778]
  3. Key R&D Program of Hubei Province [2021BCD004]
  4. Hubei Science and Technology Major Project [31970168, 32000114, 2021ACB004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical modification of RNA plays a crucial role in its function and metabolism. This study identified that N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) modification of the enterovirus 71 (EV71) genome by NAT10, a host acetyltransferase, is essential for viral replication. ac4C enhances viral translation and stability, and facilitates the binding of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to viral RNA. Moreover, a mutant EV71 lacking ac4C showed reduced pathogenicity in vivo. These findings uncover the importance of ac4C in EV71 infection and provide insights into potential antiviral treatments.
Chemical modifications are important for RNA function and metabolism. N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) is critical for the translation and stability of mRNA. Although ac4C is found in RNA viruses, the detailed mechanisms through which ac4C affects viral replication are unclear. Here, we reported that the 5 ' untranslated region of the enterovirus 71 (EV71) genome was ac4C modified by the host acetyltransferase NAT10. Inhibition of NAT10 and mutation of the ac4C sites within the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) suppressed EV71 replication. ac4C enhanced viral RNA translation via selective recruitment of PCBP2 to the IRES and boosted RNA stability. Additionally, ac4C increased the binding of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3D) to viral RNA. Notably, ac4C-deficient mutant EV71 showed reduced pathogenicity in vivo. Our findings highlighted the essential role of ac4C in EV71 infection and provided insights into potential antiviral treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据