4.6 Article

Cooperation in costly-access environments

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac7b9d

关键词

cooperation; evolutionary game theory; complex systems; social dilemmas

资金

  1. Government of Aragon, Spain
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe [E36-20R]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Agencia Espanola de Investigacion (MCIN/AEI) [PID2020-115800GB-I00]
  4. Banco Santander (Santander-UZ) [2020/0274]
  5. Soremartec SA
  6. Soremartec Italia, Ferrero Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding cooperative behavior in biological and social systems is a scientific challenge. This paper proposes a model to study the cost of participation and cooperation, and analyzes the behavior of cooperation through theoretical analysis and numerical simulations.
Understanding cooperative behavior in biological and social systems constitutes a scientific challenge, being the object of intense research over the past decades. Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the presence and persistence of cooperation in those systems, showing that there is no unique explanation, as different scenarios have different possible driving forces. In this paper, we propose a model to study situations in which voluntary participation involves an access cost to the cooperative interaction, besides the cost associated with cooperation. The proposed costly-access prisoner's dilemma (PD), a symmetric donation game with voluntary and costly participation, breaks the symmetry between abstainers and participants of the voluntary PD. A mean-field approach shows that, in well-mixed populations, the dynamic always leads the system to abstention. However, depending on the return parameter, numerical simulations in structured populations display an alternating behavior between mono-strategic, multi-stable, and coexistence phases. This behavior is fully explained through a theoretical analysis of the strategic motifs, the transitions being determined by the change in stability of those motifs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据