4.5 Article

On the time course of the tolerance of letter detectors to rotations: A masked priming ERP investigation

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108259

关键词

Letter rotation; Word processing; Masked priming; ERPs

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PRE2018-083922, PID2020-116740 GB-I00 [MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides evidence in support of the LCD model of word recognition by showing that letter rotations of around 45 degrees incur a processing cost, which is reflected in decreased identity priming effects.
A straightforward prediction of the Local Combination Detectors [LCD] model of word recognition (Dehaene et al., 2005) is that letter rotations above 40-45 should disrupt the mapping of the visual input onto orthographic representations. However, the evidence supporting this claim is scarce and not conclusive. To shed light on this issue, we conducted a masked repetition priming lexical decision experiment while recording the participants' EEG measures. Targets were always presented in the standard horizontal format, and we rotated the individual letters of the identity/unrelated primes (0, 45, or 90). Behavioral and Event-Related Potentials (ERP) results revealed that the identity priming effect decreased as a function of letter rotation. Importantly, the ERP data allowed us to examine in detail the time course of processing of words with rotated letters. Amplitude comparisons showed that identity priming followed the typical course for 0 primes (i.e., it started around 100 ms, in the visual feature encoding stage, and strengthened with processing time). The parallel effect for 45 primes emerged later, at around 175 ms. This pattern strongly suggests that letter rotations at around 45 have a processing cost, thus providing evidence in favor of the LCD model of word recognition (Dehaene et al., 2005).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据