4.5 Review

Assessment of disease outcome measures in systemic sclerosis

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 527-541

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00803-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Scleroderma Foundation
  3. Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assessment of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is challenging, and improved outcome measures are needed. Biomarker studies focused on skin disease may provide opportunities for earlier detection of therapeutic effect. By incorporating high-throughput sequencing and biomarkers, we can gain better understanding of the disease mechanisms in systemic sclerosis.
The assessment of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is challenging owing to its heterogeneous manifestations across multiple organ systems, the variable rate of disease progression and regression, and the relative paucity of patients in early-phase therapeutic trials. Despite some recent successes, most clinical trials have failed to show efficacy, underscoring the need for improved outcome measures linked directly to disease pathogenesis, particularly applicable for biomarker studies focused on skin disease. Current outcome measures in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease and SSc skin disease are largely adequate, although advancing imaging technology and the incorporation of skin mRNA biomarkers might provide opportunities for earlier detection of the therapeutic effect. Biomarkers can further inform pathogenesis, enabling early phase trials to act as reverse translational studies through the incorporation of routine high-throughput sequencing. Assessing systemic sclerosis (SSc) disease activity is challenging, and improved outcome measures are needed. This Review describes clinical and biochemical outcome measures of distinct features of SSc, with an emphasis on the dermatological manifestations and interstitial lung disease, including insights into biomarkers gained from single-cell RNA sequencing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据