4.8 Article

Substantial somatic genomic variation and selection for BCOR mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01147-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist Award [C60100/A23916]
  2. Dr Josef Steiner Cancer Research Award 2019
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Cancer Research UK Pioneer Award
  5. Wellcome Intermediate Clinical Fellowship [WT100183]
  6. NIHR-BRC Cambridge core grant [BRC-125-20014]
  7. UK Regenerative Medicine Platform [MR/R015724/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores human induced pluripotent stem cells derived from different tissues, finding UV-related damage and mutations in skin fibroblast-derived cells, while blood-derived cells show a high prevalence of acquired mutations.
We explored human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from different tissues to gain insights into genomic integrity at single-nucleotide resolution. We used genome sequencing data from two large hiPSC repositories involving 696 hiPSCs and daughter subclones. We find ultraviolet light (UV)-related damage in similar to 72% of skin fibroblast-derived hiPSCs (F-hiPSCs), occasionally resulting in substantial mutagenesis (up to 15 mutations per megabase). We demonstrate remarkable genomic heterogeneity between independent F-hiPSC clones derived during the same round of reprogramming due to oligoclonal fibro-blast populations. In contrast, blood-derived hiPSCs (B-hiPSCs) had fewer mutations and no UV damage but a high prevalence of acquired BCOR mutations (26.9% of lines). We reveal strong selection pressure for BCOR mutations in F-hiPSCs and B-hiPSCs and provide evidence that they arise in vitro. Directed differentiation of hiPSCs and RNA sequencing showed that BCOR mutations have functional consequences. Our work strongly suggests that detailed nucleotide-resolution characterization is essential before using hiPSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据