4.8 Article

A p53-phosphoinositide signalosome regulates nuclear AKT activation

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1099-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-022-00949-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35GM134955]
  2. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Programme [W81XWH-17-1-0258, W81XWH-17-1-0259, W81XWH-21-1-0129]
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals a novel mechanism of interaction between nuclear p53 and the PI3K-AKT pathway, which is distinct from the canonical membrane-localized pathway. It shows that genotoxic stress activates nuclear AKT through a p53-dependent mechanism, leading to the inhibition of DNA damage-induced apoptosis. This finding highlights the therapeutic relevance of the nuclear p53-phosphoinositide signalosome, as it is insensitive to currently available PI3K inhibitors.
The tumour suppressor p53 and PI3K-AKT pathways have fundamental roles in the regulation of cell growth and apoptosis, and are frequently mutated in cancer. Here, we show that genotoxic stress induces nuclear AKT activation through a p53-dependent mechanism that is distinct from the canonical membrane-localized PI3K-AKT pathway. Following genotoxic stress, a nuclear PI3K binds p53 in the non-membranous nucleoplasm to generate a complex of p53 and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3), which recruits AKT, PDK1 and mTORC2 to activate AKT and phosphorylate FOXO proteins, thereby inhibiting DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Wild-type p53 activates nuclear AKT in an on/off fashion following stress, whereas mutant p53 dose-dependently stimulates high basal AKT activity. The p53-PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3 complex is dephosphorylated to p53-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate by PTEN to inhibit AKT activation. The nuclear p53-phosphoinositide signalosome is distinct from the canonical membrane-localized pathway and insensitive to PI3K inhibitors currently in the clinic, which underscores its therapeutic relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据