4.8 Article

A review of geometry-confined perovskite morphologies: From synthesis to efficient optoelectronic applications

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 7402-7431

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4342-2

关键词

geometry confinement; metal halide perovskite; controllable morphology; optoelectronics

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L022559/1, EP/L022559/2, EP/V050311/1, EP/W004399/1]
  2. Royal Society [RG130230, 1E161214]
  3. Queen Mary University of London
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [790666]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [790666] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geometry-confined technologies have been widely applied to improve the performance of perovskite-based optoelectronic devices. This review summarizes recent progress in the preparation and manufacture of various perovskite morphologies and discusses the challenges for further improvements.
With the continuous study of metal halide perovskite, geometry-confined technologies have been widely applied to reduce the material dimensionality and to produce pre-designed structures, which can tune optical reflectance, scattering, and absorption, thereby optimizing the performance of perovskite-based optoelectronic devices and improving their commercial competitiveness. The morphologies of perovskite active layer play a pivotal role in optoelectronic properties and the resulting device performances. In this review, we systematically summarized recent progress in the preparation and manufacture of various perovskite geometry-confined morphologies, as well as their promising advances in different optoelectronic applications, including photodetectors, solar cells (SCs), lasers, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). In addition, the remaining challenges and further improvements of preparation unique geometry-confined perovskite morphologies for next-generation high quality optoelectronic devices are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据