4.6 Article

Repeat-Associated Non-AUG Translation of AGAGGG Repeats that Cause X-Linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 2284-2289

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.29183

关键词

X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism; RAN translation; repeat expansion; SVA retrotransposon; Dipeptide repeat proteins; TAF1

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides the first in-vitro evidence that XDP-related (AGAGGG)(n) repeat expansions can undergo repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation, which lays a theoretical foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration caused by this mutation.
Background X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by the intronic insertion of a SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) retrotransposon carrying an (AGAGGG)(n) repeat expansion in the TAF1 gene. The molecular mechanisms by which this mutation causes neurodegeneration remain elusive. Objectives We investigated whether (AGAGGG)(n) repeats undergo repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation, a pathogenic mechanism common among repeat expansion diseases. Methods XDP-specific RAN translation reporter plasmids were generated, transfected in HEK293 cells, and putative dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) were detected by Western blotting. Immunocytochemistry was performed in COS-7 cells to determine the subcellular localization of one DPR. Results We detected putative DPRs from two reading frames, supporting the translation of poly-(Glu-Gly) and poly-(Arg-Glu) species. XDP RAN translation initiates within the (AGAGGG)(n) sequence and poly-(Glu-Gly) DPRs formed nuclear inclusions in transfected cells. Conclusions In summary, our work provides the first in-vitro proof of principle that the XDP-linked (AGAGGG)(n) repeat expansions can undergo RAN translation. (c) 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据